That thought is based on Global Warming being a "THEORY" and not a reality.
As long as it is a THEORY then the general population does not have to subscribe to the reality.
The longer people wait to accept the reality the harder it will be to change course.
WHO IS SPENDING THE MONEY TO MAKE GLOBAL WARMING A THEORY?
THE AUTOMOTIVE, PETROLEUM AND COAL INDUSTRIES!
THEY HAVE LOBBYISTS WHO HAVE POLITICIANS WHO HAVE VOTERS WHO STILL CLAIM THAT GLOBAL WARMING IS NOT A FACT.
WHY DOES IT ALWAYS SEEM TO BE CONSERVATIVE REPUBLICANS AND CONSERVATIVE TALK SHOW HOSTS WHO CLAIM THAT NOTHING HAS BEEN PROVED?
Misinformation is a tool that can be used by both sides of the issue.
But one side seems to be pointing out problems and the other side keeps saying there is no problem.
Which side will have the most regrets?
But one thing I've noticed about conservative republican positions. When they are proven wrong they just take up another issue and move along like nothing happened.
Regrets and apologies are not part of the conservatives mode of operation.
Why is that?
Of course the same thing can probably be said for liberal thinkers but the difference is that liberal thinkers seem to be open to VIEWING SITUATIONS that might be causing problems and therefore are constantly looking for solutions to global issues.
Responsibility is an interesting word when it comes to Global Warming.
ALL POLITICAL IDEOLOGISTS SHOULD USE EXTREME RESPONSIBILITY WHEN DEALING WITH A PLANETARY CRISIS.
I'm starting to sound like the Una-Bomber but it absolutely amazes me how the sides are drawn up regarding the issue of Global Warming.
One side says we need to deal with the facts and do things to reduce our carbon footprints.
The other side says it's just a theory and there's no such thing as a carbon footprint.
CHECK OUT ANTARCTICA AND TELL ME NOTHING IS GOING ON
http://topics.cnn.com/topics/antarctica
THEORY?
PLEASE!
HELLO!
Michael Timothy McAlevey
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment